Attention: Restrictions on use of AUA, AUAER, and UCF content in third party applications, including artificial intelligence technologies, such as large language models and generative AI.
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.

Safety for the Urologist During Endourological Surgery

By: David T. Miller, MD; Michelle J. Semins, MD | Posted on: 01 Dec 2022

The headlines are raising the alarm. Rising burnout rates among physicians and risk of personal injury due to the physical demands placed on surgeons are alarming. We must ask: “How can we take better care of ourselves?” This call to action is reflected in the revised modern Hippocratic oath: “I will attend to my own health, well-being, and abilities in order to provide care of the highest standard.”1 The risks to urologists in the operating room include hazardous exposures such as radiation, bodily fluids, laser energy, as well as the physical demands of operating.

Radiation

Radiation exposure for the urologist is at present unavoidable. Fortunately, there has been a growing initiative to keep radiation usage during cases as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). The risk of radiation to the urologist is difficult to quantify and varies widely in the literature. For stochastic effects, the linear no-threshold model proposes that any exposure can present a risk.

Techniques to lower this risk include proper shielding with the use of thyroid shield, 2-piece wraparound lead, and lead glasses. Recent studies have shown that up to 20% of urologists may not be using thyroid shields, and only 16% of urologists wear lead glasses.2 The exposure to a urologist per percutaneous nephrolithotomy is low at around 0.05-0.21 mSv per case, but as mentioned previously, the linear no-threshold model suggests that any exposure can entail risk.3 Moreover, dosimeter use to track exposure among endourologists is poor, and doses likely vary significantly.

In addition to personal protection, radiation reduction protocols and adjusting fluoroscopy device settings can decrease total fluoroscopy time up to 80%.4 Education is also important, and implementing a curriculum for radiation safety training for physicians reduces fluoroscopy usage by over 50%.5 Switching device settings to low dose, collimating, and limiting pulses to 1 frame per second can decrease radiation exposure and total fluoroscopy time by over 50% with no significant effect on total operating time.6,7 Other techniques that can be used to reduce exposure include using save-and-swap technology, using the laser guide to target the location without image exposure, marking the areas of interest on the drape and floor to allow for easy transition of the fluoroscope, and using visual and tactile cues before pedal depression.

Promising results of “fluoro-less” endourological procedures are emerging, and performing endourological procedures is feasible without the use of radiation.8,9

Figure. Safety recommendations by body region.17,19

Eyes

The eye is particularly exposed during endourological surgery to bodily fluids, radiation, and laser energy. During ureteroscopy eye exposure to blood droplets has been shown to occur in up to 50% of cases on a microscopic level, with gross blood exposure almost 10% of the time.10 Nearly 30% of urologists forgo use of any eyewear at all during ureteroscopy.11 Fortunately, the risk of contracting a blood-borne infection from this exposure is low, but not zero.

Radiation exposure affects the eye as a deterministic effect, meaning there is a threshold cumulative dose that leads to cataract formation. It is estimated that to reach this threshold dose a urologist would have to perform 20 cases using fluoroscopy per month for 50 years.12 This threshold, though high, is conceivable to reach within the career of a high-volume endourologist. Lead glasses have been shown to reduce eye exposure up to 95%; however, as mentioned previously, use among endourologists is low.2

Finally, with the use of laser energy, there is a theoretical risk of ocular injury. Thulium carries an increased risk of eye injury compared to holmium. Fortunately, for thulium, laser-specific safety goggles provide complete protection, and prescription glasses provide partial protection.13 For holmium, regular glasses appear sufficient to prevent injury at all distances.14

Ergonomics

Surgeons are by nature focused on the task at hand, which sometimes comes at the expense of proper ergonomics leading to biomechanical stresses. In a survey of endourologists around two-thirds reported orthopedic complaints with the most frequent being back, neck, hand, and knee issues.15 While these issues are common, awareness is low.16

To reduce risk of orthopedic issues the surgeon should ensure optimal ergonomics for each case. As detailed by Gabrielson et al, display monitors should be placed 80-120 cm away, directly in front of the operating surgeon to allow for less than 30° of neck flexion (see Figure). The upper body should be positioned with elbows bending between 90° and 120° with arms abducted no more than 30°. A finger grip rather than a palm grip of the ureteroscope is preferable. Surgeons should be primarily engaging the wrist and finger muscles to control the scope as opposed to large inefficient movements with the shoulders and elbows. The foot pedal should be placed such that dorsiflexion is less than 25°, and alternating which foot controls the pedal also decreases fatigue.17

Proper selection of equipment and instruments can also lessen physical strain. For example, wearing 2-piece lead aprons improves weight distribution compared with 1-piece aprons.18 Use of lighter ureteroscopes results in less muscle group activation and decreases surgeon fatigue.19

The Pregnant Endourologist

Lastly, one unique group that is at potentially higher risk in the operating room is the pregnant endourologist. Pregnancy should be declared to the radiation safety officer from the onset of pregnancy. A fetal dosimeter should be assigned for those with any radiation usage, and badge dose should be checked monthly. Dr Somani’s team recently looked at rules and regulations for a pregnant endourologist in 12 European countries, and found a lack of universal guidance and varied practices.20 While no guidelines exist, some safety considerations specific to the operating room include fetal radiation exposure, additional shielding, lead gown specifications, and standing and lifting restrictions.

Conclusion

There are many potential safety concerns for the urologist during endourological surgery. Steps to mitigate the risks of occupational exposure include proper lead shielding, decreasing radiation usage, practicing sound ergonomics to limit orthopedic injury, and the use of eye protection. As urologists, we should ensure optimal self-care to promote career longevity.

  1. World Medical Association. WMA Statement on Physicians Well-Being. October 2015. Accessed September 22, 2022. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-statement-on-physicians-well-being/
  2. Dudley AG, Semins MJ. Radiation practice patterns and exposure in the high-volume endourologist. Urology. 2015;85(5):1019-1024.
  3. Balaji SS, Vijayakumar M, Singh AG, Ganpule AP, Sabnis RB, Desai MR. Analysis of factors affecting radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. BJU Int. 2019;124(3):514-521.
  4. Blair B, Huang G, Arnold D, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy protocol for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: feasibility, outcomes and effects on fluoroscopy time. J Urol. 2013;190(6):2112-2116.
  5. Weld LR, Nwoye UO, Knight RB, et al. Safety, minimization, and awareness radiation training reduces fluoroscopy time during unilateral ureteroscopy. Urology. 2014;84(3):520-525.
  6. Elkoushy MA, Shahrour W, Andonian S. Pulsed fluoroscopy in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2012;79(6):1230-1235.
  7. Yecies TS, Semins MJ. Radiation mitigation techniques in kidney stone management. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(2):265-272.
  8. Güner B, Günaydın B. Retrograde intrarenal surgery without fluoroscopy: is it possible? A randomized prospective study, an extraordinary experience. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019;43(10):521-525.
  9. El-Shaer W, Kandeel W, Abdel-Lateef S, Torky A, Elshaer A. Complete ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone and supine positions: a randomized controlled study. Urology. 2019;128:31-37.
  10. Wines MP, Lamb A, Argyropoulos AN, Caviezel A, Gannicliffe C, Tolley D. Blood splash injury: an underestimated risk in endourology. J Endourol. 2008;22(6):1183-1188.
  11. Paterson NR, Fitzpatrick R, Blew B, Denstedt J, Watterson J. Perceptions and practice patterns of holmium laser goggles in endourological procedures: an unnecessary evil?. J Endourol. 2019;33(2):146-150.
  12. Taylor ER, Kramer B, Frye TP, Wang S, Schwartz BF, Köhler TS. Ocular radiation exposure in modern urological practice. J Urol. 2013;190(1):139-143.
  13. Lee MJ, Czajkowski S, Gershon A, et al. Better safe than sorry? Results from an ex-vivo study demonstrate that the thulium fiber laser may cause eye injury without standard protection. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022;16(8):283-288.
  14. Villa L, Cloutier J, Compérat E, et al. Do we really need to wear proper eye protection when using holmium:YAG laser during endourologic procedures? Results from an ex vivo animal model on pig eyes. J Endourol. 2016;30(3):332-337.
  15. Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Prevalence of orthopedic complaints among endourologists and their compliance with radiation safety measures. J Endourol. 2011;25(10):1609-1613.
  16. Tjiam IM, Goossens RH, Schout BM, et al. Ergonomics in endourology and laparoscopy: an overview of musculoskeletal problems in urology. J Endourol. 2014;28(5):605-611.
  17. Gabrielson AT, Clifton MM, Pavlovich CP, et al. Surgical ergonomics for urologists: a practical guide. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18(3):160-169.
  18. Pelz DM. Low back pain, lead aprons, and the angiographer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(7):1364.
  19. Ludwig WW, Lee G, Ziemba JB, Ko JS, Matlaga BR. Evaluating the ergonomics of flexible ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1062-1066.
  20. Juliebø-Jones P, Pietropaolo A, Spinoit AF, et al. Rules and regulations for a pregnant endourologist: the European perspective. World J Urol. 2022;40(3):857-864.

advertisement

advertisement