Attention: Restrictions on use of AUA, AUAER, and UCF content in third party applications, including artificial intelligence technologies, such as large language models and generative AI.
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.

PROSTATE CANCER Reducing the Musculoskeletal Side Effects of Treatment in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

By: Craig Jones, MBChB, MRes (Dist), FRCS (Urol), The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Genito Urinary Cancer Research Group/FASTMAN, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, United Kingdom; Noel W. Clarke, MBBS, FRCS (Urol), ChM, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Salford Royal NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Genito Urinary Cancer Research Group/FASTMAN, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, United Kingdom | Posted on: 27 Nov 2023

Approximately 16% of men with prostate cancer in the United Kingdom have metastatic disease at diagnosis,1 with bone being the most common site of spread.2 Progression of bone metastases can lead to skeletal events including pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, or significant bone pain, and the incidence of skeletal related events is high (44% at 5 years).3 Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the mainstay treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, leads to disruption of bone remodeling, resulting in rapid and progressive bone density loss4,5 occurring within 12 months of starting treatment.6,7 Coupled with a higher incidence of osteoporosis at diagnosis compared with age-matched controls,8 men with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer on long-term ADT have a significantly increased risk of fracture.9 In addition to the effects on bone health, ADT leads to decreased muscle mass and increased visceral and subcutaneous fat, contributing to the metabolic syndrome.10,11 Effects on body composition occur early, typically within 3 to 12 months of starting ADT.12 Loss of muscle mass, termed sarcopenia, increases the risk of fall and fracture13 and is an independent risk factor for cancer-specific survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer.14

Recent treatment advances have led to significant survival improvements with the addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors to ADT for men with metastatic prostate cancer.15-18 A meta-analysis of data from 14 randomized clinical trials involving 17,411 patients demonstrated an increased risk of both fractures and falls in men with prostate cancer treated with the addition of an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor compared to their respective control.19

Clinical guidelines currently recommend bone protection, including bisphosphonates and the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand inhibitor denosumab, only to men at increased risk of fracture determined by bone density assessment using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry or fracture risk assessment tools including FRAX.20 Both of these methods have significant limitations in predicting risk of fracture in men with metastatic bone disease on long-term ADT.21 Recent data from the STAMPEDE trial highlight the high cumulative incidence of clinical fractures in men with newly diagnosed metastatic disease and the significant risk reduction with the addition of zoledronic acid, albeit with a dose that was higher than would typically be used for osteoporosis (4 mg 3-weekly for 6 doses then 4-weekly for 2 years vs 5 mg once/twice yearly). However, data from the CALBG 90202 trial failed to show a significant reduction in skeletal related events with use of early zoledronic acid in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.22 There is good evidence that denosumab prevents bone density loss and reduces the risk of vertebral fractures in men with prostate cancer.23 An important consideration with denosumab is the risk of rebound vertebral fractures following discontinuation.24 Patients on zoledronic acid or denosumab should undergo regular dental checks due to risk of jaw osteonecrosis, which is more common at higher doses.25 Calcium and vitamin D supplementation are encouraged for all patients on lifelong ADT, along with regular weight-bearing exercise. However, these methods alone are unlikely to be sufficient on their own.26 The STAMINA trial, currently recruiting in the United Kingdom, is evaluating the effectiveness of long-term supervised exercise in men on ADT.27

Metformin may also help to mitigate the deleterious side effects of ADT along with potential anticancer effects: This is under evaluation in the STAMPEDE trial’s metformin comparison and in its associated metabolic substudy, which recently closed recruitment.28 Alternative approaches to ADT using transdermal estrogen have shown promising results in preserving bone density compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists.29 Data from these studies and others are awaited.

In summary, patients with metastatic prostate cancer are now living longer and, consequently, they have a higher risk of skeletal complications, including fracture. Clinicians should advise patients about the known musculoskeletal side effects of ADT. Bone-protective agents should be considered for patients starting long-term ADT to help limit bone density loss. New data from STAMPEDE have shown significant fracture risk reduction by adding zoledronic acid to ADT. However, more data are needed to determine the optimum dose and schedule of bone protection agents, weighing this against potential toxicities. Focusing on survivorship rather than just survival, it is important to explore the role of alternative treatments and strategies which may help mitigate the unwanted toxicities associated with long-term ADT.

  1. National Prostate Cancer Audit. National Prostate Cancer Audit: Short Report 2022. September 8, 2022. Accessed May 18, 2023. https://www.npca.org.uk/content/uploads/2022/09/NPCA_Short-report-2022_Final-08.09.22.pdf
  2. Gandaglia G, Abdollah F, Schiffmann J, et al. Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: a population-based analysis. Prostate. 2014;74(2):210-216.
  3. Parry MG, Cowling TE, Sujenthiran A, et al. Identifying skeletal-related events for prostate cancer patients in routinely collected hospital data. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019;63:101628.
  4. Saylor PJ, Smith MR. Metabolic complications of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2009;181(5):1998-2008.
  5. Clarke NW, McClure J, George NJ. The effects of orchidectomy on skeletal metabolism in metastatic prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1993;27(4):475-483.
  6. Daniell HW, Dunn SR, Ferguson DW, Lomas G, Niazi Z, Stratte PT. Progressive osteoporosis during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2000;163(1):181-186.
  7. Berruti A, Dogliotti L, Terrone C, et al. Changes in bone mineral density, lean body mass and fat content as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with prostate cancer without apparent bone metastases given androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol. 2002;167(6):2361-2367.
  8. Hussain SA, Weston R, Stephenson RN, George E, Parr NJ. Immediate dual energy x-ray absorptiometry reveals a high incidence of osteoporosis in patients with advanced prostate cancer before hormonal manipulation. BJU Int. 2003;92(7):690-694.
  9. Shahinian VB, Kuo YF, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS. Risk of fracture after androgen deprivation for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(2):154-164.
  10. Smith MR, Saad F, Egerdie B, Sieber PR, Tammela TL, Ke C. Sarcopenia during androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(26):3271-3276.
  11. Hamilton EJ, Gianatti E, Strauss BJ, et al. Increase in visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011;74(3):377-383.
  12. Lee H, McGovern K, Finkelstein JS, Smith MR. Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during initial and long-term gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104(8):1633-1637.
  13. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31.
  14. Ikeda T, Ishihara H, Iizuka J, et al. Prognostic impact of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020;50(8):933-939.
  15. Attard G, Murphy L, Clarke NW, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy: final results from two randomised phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(5):443-456.
  16. Smith MR, Hussain M, Saad F, et al. Darolutamide and survival in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(12):1132-1142.
  17. Fizazi K, Foulon S, Carles J, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Lancet. 2022;399(10336):1695-1707.
  18. Davis ID, Martin AJ, Stockler MR, et al. Enzalutamide with standard first-line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(2):121-131.
  19. Jones C, Gray S, Brown M, Brown J, Mc Closkey E, Rai B. A0996 Fracture and fall risk in men with advanced or metastatic prostate cancer treated with novel androgen receptor signalling inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur Urol. 2023;83:S1429-S1430.
  20. Brown JE, Handforth C, Compston JE, et al. Guidance for the assessment and management of prostate cancer treatment-induced bone loss. A consensus position statement from an expert group. J Bone Oncol. 2020;25:100311.
  21. Dalla Volta A, Mazziotti G, Maffezzoni F, et al. Bone mineral density and FRAX score may not predict fracture risk in patients with cancer undergoing hormone deprivation therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(29):3363-3366.
  22. Smith MR, Halabi S, Ryan CJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of early zoledronic acid in men with castration-sensitive prostate cancer and bone metastases: results of CALGB 90202 (alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(11):1143-1150.
  23. Smith MR, Egerdie B, Toriz NH, et al. Denosumab in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):745-755.
  24. Cummings SR, Ferrari S, Eastell R, et al. Vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab: a post hoc analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled FREEDOM trial and its extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(2):190-198.
  25. Reyes C, Hitz M, Prieto-Alhambra D, Abrahamsen B. Risks and benefits of bisphosphonate therapies. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117(1):20-28.
  26. Joseph JS, Lam V, Patel MI. Preventing osteoporosis in men taking androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2(5):551-561.
  27. Reale S, Turner RR, Sutton E, et al. Embedding supervised exercise training for men on androgen deprivation therapy into standard prostate cancer care: a feasibility and acceptability study (the STAMINA trial). Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12470.
  28. Gillessen S, Gilson C, James N, et al. Repurposing metformin as therapy for prostate cancer within the STAMPEDE trial platform. Eur Urol. 2016;70(6):906-908
  29. Langley RE, Kynaston HG, Alhasso AA, et al. A randomised comparison evaluating changes in bone mineral density in advanced prostate cancer: luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists versus transdermal oestradiol. Eur Urol. 2016;69(6):1016-1025.

advertisement

advertisement