Attention: Restrictions on use of AUA, AUAER, and UCF content in third party applications, including artificial intelligence technologies, such as large language models and generative AI.
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.

Can We Predict Unsafe Bladders in Spina Bifida Without Urodynamics?

By: Joan S. Ko, MD, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, California, University of Southern California, Los Angeles | Posted on: 19 Jan 2024

Neurogenic bladder affects the vast majority of patients with spina bifida and is a major cause of end stage renal disease in this population.1 A foundational objective in the urologic care of spina bifida patients is to prevent renal deterioration through close surveillance of bladder dynamics. Guidelines for urologic screening and management of neurogenic bladder for the prevention of renal disease have been published by groups such as the European Association of Urology/European Society of Paediatric Urology and the Spina Bifida Association.2,3 However, urologic guidelines lack level 1 evidence and are based largely on expert opinion. Gaps remain in our understanding of ideal screening protocols to predict renal deterioration, and significant variability exists in the management of neurogenic bladder in spina bifida patients. Ideal protocols for bladder surveillance continue to be debated as practices vary among institutions as well as among individual pediatric urologists.

Many pediatric urologists use routine renal bladder ultrasound (RBUS) with or without voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) to guide the frequency of urodynamic studies (UDS) to elucidate bladder characteristics that may lead to renal deterioration. Particular variability exists in the use of VCUG in routine screening of neurogenic bladder.4 To better understand which RBUS and VCUG findings may predict higher risk bladder characteristics on UDS, we aimed to study the relationship between these findings with UDS detrusor leak point pressures (DLPP) and end filling pressures (EFP).5

We retrospectively identified patients with spina bifida at a single institution who underwent at least 1 UDS from 2015 to 2021. We included patients up to 18 years of age who had a RBUS and/or VCUG performed within 6 months of the UDS. Patients who had undergone augmentation cystoplasty prior to these studies were excluded. We also excluded patients who underwent urologic interventions such as initiation of clean intermittent catheterization or anticholinergics during the interim time between studies. All studies were reviewed by our study team. The degree of hydronephrosis on RBUS was assessed using the Society for Fetal Urology grading system. VCUGs were assessed for the presence of vesicoureteral reflux, and the images were evaluated for the presence of bladder trabeculations (graded mild, moderate, and severe), the appearance of the bladder neck during leak/void (open, closed, open with a closed sphincter), and the shape of the bladder (round, elongated, conical/“Christmas tree”). DLPP or EFP were assessed on the UDS. DLPP and EFP were assessed as continuous variables but were also risk stratified into 3 groups (<25 cm H2O, 25-40 cm H2O, and >40 cm H2O) for analysis.

A total of 129 patients were identified who met study inclusion criteria. Median age at UDS was 9.6 years (IQR 3.2-14 years). Median time between UDS and RBUS was 2.0 months (IQR 0.9-3.5 months), and median time between UDS and VCUG was 2.4 months (IQR 1.1-3.8 months). When analyzing RBUS findings with DLPP/EFP as a continuous variable, worsening degrees of hydronephrosis appeared to correlate with higher DLPP and EFP (Table 1). This correlation was, however, lost when DLPP and EFP were analyzed categorically into the stratified risk categories (Table 2). When DLPP/EFP were analyzed both continuously and categorically, nonround bladder shape and severity of trabeculations had a high level of correlation with higher DLPP/EFP (P < .0001). The presence of vesicoureteral reflux notably did not correlate with higher DLPP and EFP in any of our analyses (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1. Unadjusted and Age- and Sex-Adjusted Linear Regression Analyses Indicating the Associations Between UDS Mean EFP/DLPP and RBUS, VCUG, and eGFR Findings Among 129 Pediatric Spina Bifida Patients

Unadjusted Adjusted for age and sex
Estimate (95% CI) P value Estimate (95% CI) P value
Evidence of hydronephrosis
 None (Ref) (Ref)
 Mild 3.9 (−2.8-10.5) .25 6.3 (−0.3-13.0) .06
 Moderate-severe 9.4 (0.4-18.3) .04a 12.4 (3.7-21.1) .006a
Evidence of VUR 4.3 (−3.6-12.1) .28 5.0 (−2.7-12.7) .20
Bladder shape
 Round (Ref) < .0001a (Ref) < .0001a
 Nonround 16.4 (10.8-22.0) 15.5 (9.6-21.5)
Evidence of trabeculations 14.2 (8.2-20.2) < .0001a 13.5 (7.1-19.8) < .0001a
Trabeculation severity
 None (Ref) - (Ref) -
 Mild 6.6 (−0.1-13.4) .05a 5.7 (−1.4-12.8) .11
 Moderate 18.9 (11.5-26.4) < .0001a 17.9 (10.1-25.6) < .0001a
 Severe 23.4 (14.6-32.3) < .0001a 22.6 (13.7-31.6) < .0001a
Bladder neck on voiding phase
 Open (Ref) - (Ref) -
 Closed −2.9 (−10.6-4.8) .45 −4.2 (−9.8-7.0) .41
 Open with closed sphincter 0.9 (−7.0-8.7) .83 −1.4 (−9.8-7.0) .74
eGFR per 10-unit increase −0.6 (−1.4-0.1) .10 −0.7 (−1.5-0.0) .06
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DLPP, detrusor leak point pressures; EFP, end filling pressures; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; RBUS, routine renal bladder ultrasound; Ref, reference; UDS, urodynamic studies; VCUG, voiding cystourethrogram; VUR, vesicoureteral reflux.
a P < .05.

Table 2. Comparison of RBUS and VCUG Findings by UDS EFP/DLPP <25, 25-40, and >40 Among 129 Pediatric Spina Bifida Patients

DLPP/EFP <25 DLPP/EFP 25-40 DLPP/EFP >40 P value
n % n % n %
Hydronephrosis Yes 20 28.6 15 39.5 8 44.4 .32
No 50 71.4 23 60.5 10 55.6
VUR Yes 8 14.3 10 29.4 4 28.6 .18
No 48 85.7 24 70.6 10 71.4
Bladder shape Round 45 80.4 11 32.4 3 21.4 < .00001a
Nonround 11 19.6 23 67.6 11 78.6
Bladder neck Open 22 39.3 12 35.3 6 42.9 .89
Closed 19 33.9 11 32.4 3 21.4
Open with closed sphincter 15 26.8 11 32.4 5 35.7
Trabeculations Yes 23 41.1 27 79.4 13 92.9 .00004a
No 33 58.9 7 20.6 1 7.1
Abbreviations: DLPP, detrusor leak point pressures; EFP, end filling pressures; RBUS, routine renal bladder ultrasound; UDS, urodynamic studies; VCUG, voiding cystourethrogram; VUR, vesicoureteral reflux.
a P < .05.

This study indicates that hydronephrosis on RBUS, bladder shape on VCUG, and severity of bladder trabeculations on VCUG correlate with high-risk bladder characteristics on UDS. Interestingly, our analysis suggests that these VCUG findings may correlate more strongly with higher DLPP/EFP than hydronephrosis on RBUS. As these correlations were noted retrospectively, prospective studies are needed to better understand the predictive value of RBUS and VCUG findings in the identification of high-risk features in neurogenic bladder.

  1. Tanaka ST, Paramsothy P, Thibadeau J, et al. Baseline urinary tract imaging in infants enrolled in the UMPIRE protocol for children with spina bifida. J Urol. 2019;201(6):1193-1198.
  2. Joseph DB, Baum MA, Tanaka ST, et al. Urologic guidelines for the care and management of people with spina bifida. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2020;13(4):479-489.
  3. Stein R, Bogaert G, Dogan HS, et al. EAU/ESPU guidelines on the management of neurogenic bladder in children and adolescent part I diagnostics and conservative treatment. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(1):45-57.
  4. Lodwick D, Asti L, Deans K, Minneci P, McLeod D. Variation in practice patterns for the management of newborn spina bifida in the United States. Urology. 2017;100:207-212.
  5. Hannallah A, Baker ZG, Cowan A, Bajakian T, Vasquez E, Ko JS. Imaging characteristics predicting elevated detrusor pressures in patients with spina bifida. J Pediatr Urol. 2023;19(1):65.e61-65.e67.

advertisement

advertisement