Attention: Restrictions on use of AUA, AUAER, and UCF content in third party applications, including artificial intelligence technologies, such as large language models and generative AI.
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.

AUA ADVOCACY Advocacy for Environmental Sustainability in Urologic Operating Rooms: Implications for Environmental and Human Well-Being

By: Isabella S. Florissi, MD, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Oscar Li, BS, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Sunil H. Patel, MD, MA, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland | Posted on: 03 Jun 2024

In the US, health systems generate 6 million tons of medical waste,1 1 million tons of noninfectious plastic,2 and a startling 8.5% of the nation’s total greenhouse gas emissions each year.3 Operating rooms and labor and delivery suites are 3 to 6 times more energy intensive than clinical areas4 and generate 60% of total hospital regulated medical waste.5 Because regulated biohazardous waste requires specific costly and environmentally harmful processes for safe elimination, proper separation of medical waste into regulated medical waste (RMW) and nonregulated municipal waste is integral to minimizing the cost and carbon footprint associated with waste disposal.

In an analysis of waste generated from 31 urologic cases performed at a single institution during a 3-month period, an average of 11.11 kg in waste was generated per case: RMW represented 31% of the total waste, while non-RMW represented 53% of total waste weight. Improper disposal of non-RMW items was identified in all cases, highlighting the importance of cautious separation of medical waste to reduce the financial and environmental burden of its disposal.6 Noting that 80% of packaging waste is generated before a patient enters the operating room, precautions focused on separating this large proportion of nonbiohazardous waste before exposure to bodily fluids could be beneficial in reducing the cost of waste disposal (Figure).7

Image

Figure. The intersection of health systems, environmental waste, and human illness in the operating room. Used with permission of Oscar Li.

It is essential that urologists take action to streamline waste disposal in operative rooms, revise operative trays and preference cards to minimize the inclusion of extraneous instruments,8 reduce the amount of printed resources utilized in exchange for virtual information, and raise awareness at their institution about environmental sustainability in operative settings. Urologists, especially those practicing in academic settings, can utilize their role as educators in promoting change towards a culture of sustainability in current and future generations of trainees. Moreover, as the global urology device market is worth over $35 billion and expected to grow significantly in the next decade,9 urologists can collaborate with device manufacturers to create more efficient and sustainable packaging and reduce their carbon footprint. These efforts can be further supported in collaboration with sustainability committees within health care groups, across other surgical subspecialties, through advocacy groups within the AUA, and even with larger organizations such as the American Medical Association.

Environmental emissions associated with waste disposal pose a significant threat to medical well-being. In fact, by-product components of plastics including bisphenol A (BPA) have been shown to accumulate in a dose-ependent fashion in human tissue and act as carcinogens and endocrine disruptors.10 In the US, 90% of the population is exposed to BPAs, which have been linked to breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma.10 Moreover, it has been demonstrated in animal models that BPA activates the androgen receptor, suggestive of a link between BPA and the development of prostate cancer.11 Follow-up analyses of patients with prostate cancers identified higher levels of urinary BPA concentration in patients with prostate cancer.12 Additional studies indicate that BPA can also adversely affect the efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy, which is the mainstay of treatment for prostate cancer,11 cause kidney toxicity via direct glomerular injury,13 and alter mitochondrial metabolism, promoting the progression of bladder cancer.14 Plastic by-products may also be associated with tumor progression and with attenuating the efficacy of cancer treatment.15

Considering the significant impact of waste generation and its by-products on environmental and human well-being, environmental sustainability in operating rooms is integral to protecting our planet and its inhabitants. To this end, advocacy efforts are underway to effect change in operative environmental sustainability. On Earth Day 2022, the White House/US Health and Human Services put forward the Health Sector Climate Pledge, asking health care institutions to commit to reducing health care–related environmental emissions by half by 2030, and to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.16 As of November 16, 2023, the petition has been signed by 133 organizations representing 900 hospitals.16 Within hospitals, waste audits have effectively identified and addressed potential sources of preventable waste in operation rooms.17–19

US health care represents 18% of the nation’s economy, and 10% of the global economy.20 As such, changes towards environmental sustainability in operating rooms, which are the most prominent source of revenue for health systems, would have a significant impact on environmental and human well-being. Hospitals contributing to the 2019 Environmental Excellence Awards saved $68 million on sustainability initiatives in 2018, reduced 309 million kBtus of energy, and avoided the production of 146,750 tons of waste and 182,370 metric tons of carbon emissions. This equated to a median savings of $100,000 across 327 hospitals.21 Importantly, surgeons are ready to make a change. Of surgeons interviewed at 2 major academic centers in the United States, 95% of survey respondents demonstrated willingness to reduce operative room waste and promote environmental sustainability,22 suggesting that urologists today have a responsibility and willingness to change to protect their environment, their communities, and their future patients.

  1. Jain N, LaBeaud D. How should US health care lead global change in plastic waste disposal?. AMA J Ethics. 2022;24(10):986-993. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2022.986
  2. Chaudhary K, Garg R, Bhalotra AR, Anand R, Girdhar K. Anesthetic drug wastage in the operation room: a cause for concern. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(1):56-61. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92438
  3. Digitale E. Initiatives aim to make the operating room sustainable. Stanford Medicine Magazine. Published June 2, 2023. Accessed March 28, 2024. https://stanmed.stanford.edu/greening-operating-room-sustainability/
  4. Yates EF, Bowder AN, Roa L, et al. Empowering surgeons, anesthesiologists, and obstetricians to incorporate environmental sustainability in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2021;273(6):1108-1114. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004755
  5. Greening the OR. Practice Greenhealth. Accessed April 4, 2024. https://practicegreenhealth.org/topics/greening-operating-room/greening-or
  6. Johns Hopkins Medicine. Characterizing the Burden of Intraoperative Urological Surgical Waste: Opportunities for Reduction and Mitigation. Accessed April 4, 2024. http://clinicalconnection.hopkinsmedicine.org/videos/characterizing-the-burden-of-intraoperative-urological-surgical-waste-opportunities-for-reduction-and-mitigation
  7. AU Health News. Anesthesiologists start movement to ‘Green the OR’. Accessed April 5, 2024. https://news.augustahealth.org/2023/03/10/anesthesiologists-start-movement-to-green-the-or-beginning-with-themselves/
  8. Kornberg Z, Wu J, Wilmot H, Duffina T, Shah JB. A leak in the system: addressing the environmental impact of urologic care. Eur Urol. 2023;84(3):260-262. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.035
  9. Urology Devices Market Size, Share. Industry Growth [2030]. Accessed April 5, 2024. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/urology-devices-market-106686
  10. Tsai C-F, Hsieh T-H, Lee J-N, et al. Curcumin suppresses phthalate-induced metastasis and the proportion of cancer stem cell (CSC)-like cells via the inhibition of AhR/ERK/SK1 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63(48):10388-10398. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04415
  11. Wetherill YB, Hess-Wilson JK, Comstock CES, et al. Bisphenol A facilitates bypass of androgen ablation therapy in prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5(12):3181-3190. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0272
  12. Tarapore P, Ying J, Ouyang B, Burke B, Bracken B, Ho SM. Exposure to bisphenol A correlates with early-onset prostate cancer and promotes centrosome amplification and anchorage-independent growth in vitro. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90332. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090332
  13. Kobroob A, Peerapanyasut W, Chattipakorn N, Wongmekiat O. Damaging effects of bisphenol a on the kidney and the protection by melatonin: emerging evidences from in vivo and in vitro studies. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:1-15. doi:10.1155/2018/3082438
  14. Pellerin È, Chabaud S, Pouliot F, Pelletier M, Bolduc S. Bisphenol a alters the energy metabolism of stromal cells and could promote bladder cancer progression. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(21):5461. doi:10.3390/cancers13215461
  15. Patel SH, Metcalf M, Bivalacqua TJ, Kates M. Plastic exposure and urological malignancies—an emerging field. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(12):653-654. doi:10.1038/s41585-020-00385-6
  16. Health Sector Commitments to Emissions Reduction and Resilience. Published April 21, 2022. Accessed March 28, 2024. https://www.hhs.gov/climate-change-health-equity-environmental-justice/climate-change-health-equity/actions/health-sector-pledge/index.html
  17. Kooner S, Hewison C, Sridharan S, et al. Waste and recycling among orthopedic subspecialties. Can J Surg. 2020;63(3):E278-E283. doi:10.1503/cjs.018018
  18. Ryan MT, Malmrose J, Riley CA, Tolisano AM. Operating room waste generated across otolaryngology cases. Mil Med. 2023;188(7-8):e1697-e1700. doi:10.1093/milmed/usab548
  19. Rammelkamp Z, Dirnberger J, Johnson G, Waisbren S. An audit of all waste leaving the operating room: can the surgical suite be more environmentally sustainable?. World Med Health Pol. 2021;13(1):126-136. doi:10.1002/wmh3.397
  20. Why the American Healthcare System Underperforms. Accessed April 5, 2024. https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/07/why-the-american-healthcare-system-underperforms
  21. 2019 sustainability data. Practice Greenhealth. Accessed April 5, 2024. https://practicegreenhealth.org/tools-and-resources/2019-sustainability-data
  22. Meyer MJ, Chafitz T, Wang K, et al. Surgeons’ perspectives on operating room waste: multicenter survey. Surgery. 2022;171(5):1142-1147. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.032

advertisement

advertisement