Attention: Restrictions on use of AUA, AUAER, and UCF content in third party applications, including artificial intelligence technologies, such as large language models and generative AI.
You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.

AUA ADVOCACY Health Literacy Assessments in Urologic Care to Improve Patient Outcomes

By: Olutiwa Akinsola, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Kelvin Moses, MD, PhD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee | Posted on: 18 Jun 2024

When patients are presented with a new diagnosis, they are tasked with deciphering this information and navigating their respective health care systems to obtain the appropriate care. Health literacy is essential for patients to make effective decisions. Health literacy is defined as the ability of an individual to obtain and translate information to maintain their own health care.1 It also allows patients to make informed decisions about their care, especially in instances where they are faced with multiple options. Unfortunately, poor health literacy is not uncommon in the United States—a study found nearly one-third of patients had “basic” or “below basic” health literacy in their cohort.2 And providers often overestimate patients’ level of health literacy, with this overestimation disproportionally affecting African American patients.3

The high prevalence of poor health literacy has garnered interest among researchers in multiple fields. Coleman et al recently showcased how tailoring our communication to be more inclusive of those with lower health literacy can improve access to care for minority patients.4 Another study by Carroll et al found that tailoring discharge medication information to varying health literacy levels decreased the number of medication errors in pediatric patients.5

When studying how health literacy impacts urologic patient outcomes, many investigators have found that patients with poor health literacy tend to have worse outcomes. Scarpato et al found that poor health literacy is associated with higher tumor staging at diagnosis of bladder cancer, poorer nutritional status, lower rates of compliance with follow up, and higher rates of minor complications.6 In a study focused on prostate cancer, Joyce and colleagues discovered that lower health literacy was associated with treatment-related regret.7

We must further our work regarding health literacy by developing tools within our practices that ensure the information we deliver to our patients is at the appropriate level. Some groups have been successful in creating patient-centered pathology reports for bladder and prostate cancer by combining the expertise of pathologists and patient focus groups.8-9 These types of initiatives highlight the importance of incorporating the patient perspective when developing these tools as their viewpoints are essential in this space. Currently, there are studies investigating how artificial intelligence can be used to create patient-centered information regarding urologic disease processes. Eppler et al utilized ChatGPT to create layperson summaries of specific urologic studies and found that these summaries were both accurate and easy for the average person to read.10

Future urologic care needs to cater to the needs of all patients, no matter their educational background or level of health literacy. Poor health literacy can lead to unfavorable outcomes; thus, the first step to address this issue is to assess our patients’ health literacy levels. Further work needs to be done in this area with the goal of creating patient-focused material that can be tailored to fit patients of all educational levels, as this will enable us to improve health outcomes for all our patients.

  1. Liu C, Wang D, Liu C, et al. What is the meaning of health literacy? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Fam Med Com Health. 2020;8(2):e000351. doi:10.1136/fmch-2020-000351
  2. Kutner MA. The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics; US Department of Education, 2006.
  3. Kelly PA, Haidet P. Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(1):119-122. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.007
  4. Coleman C, Birk S, DeVoe J. Health literacy and systemic racism-using clear communication to reduce health care inequities. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(8):753-754. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2558
  5. Carroll AR, Johnson JA, Stassun JC, Greevy RA, Mixon AS, Williams DJ. Health literacy-informed communication to reduce discharge medication errors in hospitalized children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(1):e2350969. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50969
  6. Scarpato KR, Kappa SF, Goggins KM, et al. The impact of health literacy on surgical outcomes following radical cystectomy. J Health Commun. 2016;21(sup2):99-104. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1193916
  7. Joyce DD, Heslop DL, Umoh JI, et al. Examining the association of health literacy and numeracy with prostate-related knowledge and prostate cancer treatment regret. Urol Oncol. 2020;38(8):682.e11-682-e19. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.007
  8. Mossanen M, Macleod LC, Chu A, et al. Comparative effectiveness of a patient centered pathology report for bladder cancer care. J Urol. 2016;196(5):1383-1389. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.083
  9. Nayak JG, Scalzo N, Chu A, et al. The development and comparative effectiveness of a patient-centered prostate biopsy report: a prospective, randomized study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020;23(1):144-150. doi:10.1038/s41391-019-0169-7
  10. Eppler MB, Ganjavi C, Knudsen JE, et al. Bridging the gap between urological research and patient understanding: the role of large language models in automated generation of layperson’s summaries. Urol Pract. 2023;10(5):436-443. doi:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000428

advertisement

advertisement